关于tcp_tw_recycle和tcp_timestamps 的误解

网上大量流传的 tcp_tw_recycle=1 并且tcp_timestamps=0 的优化建议真是害人不浅,连 HAproxy的example里都存在这样的错误:http://t.cn/zTo2IOQ ,传送门:http://t.cn/zOPRrSi http://t.cn/zTo2IOR

记得去年在kernel的文档里面发现过 tw_recyle的描述中提到 timestamps 必须等于1 recyle才会生效,但今年没找到那篇,如果哪位找到kernel的原文,麻烦请 @我 一下

|2|left
此条目发表在TCP分类目录。将固定链接加入收藏夹。

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注


Warning: fsockopen(): php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: No address associated with hostname in /mydata/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/are-you-a-human/includes/ayah.php on line 312

Warning: fsockopen(): unable to connect to ssl://ws.areyouahuman.com:443 (php_network_getaddresses: getaddrinfo failed: No address associated with hostname) in /mydata/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/are-you-a-human/includes/ayah.php on line 312

Unable to load the Are You a Human PlayThru™. Please contact the site owner to report the problem.